About a year ago, Lupica checked in with his annual pre-season “The Yankees Are Too Old!” article, comparing the average ages of the Mets and Yankees.
As usual, Lupica put his special anti-Yankee spin on the article, making the Yankees out to be senior citizens.
The Mets’ younger average age really helped out the Mets down the stretch last season, right Mike?
Apparently, Mike hasn’t learned anything from last year. This is the nonsense we got from him today...
“The Yankees better start getting younger with pitching, because it's sure not happening with the team they put on the field every day.”
The Yankees retained all of their position players, and they are all a year older.
Not a decade older.
How did this already old team do last season?
And how did the spring chickens over in Queens make out?
Let's compare!
2007 Stats
Strapping Young Mets
Offense
Batting Average - 2nd (NL)
Hits - 5th (NL)
RBI's - 5th (NL)
Home Runs - 5th (NL)
SLG - 7th (NL)
OPS - 5th (NL)
Runs - 4th (NL)
Defense
Errors - 8th Best (NL)
Fielding Percentage - T6 (NL)
Crusty Old Yankees
Offense
Batting Average - 1st (MLB)
Hits - 1st (MLB)
RBI's - 1st (MLB)
Home Runs - 1st (AL)
SLG - 1st (MLB)
OPS - 1st (MLB)
Runs - 1st (MLB)
Defense
Errors - 3rd Best (AL)
Fielding Percentage - T3 (AL)
Wow! Those crusty old position players on the Yankees owned those younger Mets in batting and fielding!
Once again Mike, your stupid ass comments are just as worthless as ever.
Sunday, March 2, 2008
One Year Later, Mike Is Still Clueless
Labels:
age
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment